Title
Randomized controlled trial of lung lavage with dilute surfactant for meconium aspiration syndrome.
Link to article in PubMed
Author(s)
Dargaville, Peter
Copnell, Beverley
Mills, John
Haron, Ismail
Lee, Jimmy
Tingay, David
Rohana, Jaafar
Mildenhall, Lindsay
Jeng, Mei-Jy
Narayanan, Anushree
Battin, Malcolm
Kuschel, Carl
Sadowsky, Joel
Patel, Harshad
Carlin, John
Morley, Colin
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether lung lavage with surfactant changes the duration of mechanical respiratory support or other outcomes in meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS).
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial that enrolled ventilated infants with MAS. Infants randomized to lavage received two 15-mL/kg aliquots of dilute bovine surfactant instilled into, and recovered from, the lung. Control subjects received standard care, which in both groups included high frequency ventilation, nitric oxide, and, where available, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
RESULTS: Sixty-six infants were randomized, with one ineligible infant excluded from analysis. Median duration of respiratory support was similar in infants who underwent lavage and control subjects (5.5 versus 6.0 days, P = .77). Requirement for high frequency ventilation and nitric oxide did not differ between the groups. Fewer infants who underwent lavage died or required ECMO: 10% (3/30) compared with 31% (11/35) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.060-0.97). Lavage transiently reduced oxygen saturation without substantial heart rate or blood pressure alterations. Mean airway pressure was more rapidly weaned in the lavage group after randomization.
CONCLUSION: Lung lavage with dilute surfactant does not alter duration of respiratory support, but may reduce mortality, especially in units not offering ECMO.
STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a randomized controlled trial that enrolled ventilated infants with MAS. Infants randomized to lavage received two 15-mL/kg aliquots of dilute bovine surfactant instilled into, and recovered from, the lung. Control subjects received standard care, which in both groups included high frequency ventilation, nitric oxide, and, where available, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).
RESULTS: Sixty-six infants were randomized, with one ineligible infant excluded from analysis. Median duration of respiratory support was similar in infants who underwent lavage and control subjects (5.5 versus 6.0 days, P = .77). Requirement for high frequency ventilation and nitric oxide did not differ between the groups. Fewer infants who underwent lavage died or required ECMO: 10% (3/30) compared with 31% (11/35) in the control group (odds ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, 0.060-0.97). Lavage transiently reduced oxygen saturation without substantial heart rate or blood pressure alterations. Mean airway pressure was more rapidly weaned in the lavage group after randomization.
CONCLUSION: Lung lavage with dilute surfactant does not alter duration of respiratory support, but may reduce mortality, especially in units not offering ECMO.
Publication information
J Pediatr . 2011 Mar;158(3):383-389.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2010.08.044. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
Date Issued
2011-03-01
Type
Journal Article
Journal Title
The Journal of pediatrics
Permanent link to this record
Owning collection
