Title
Circulating tumor DNA-guided adjuvant therapy in locally advanced colon cancer: the randomized phase 2/3 DYNAMIC-III trial.
Author(s)
Tie, Jeanne
Wang, Yuxuan
Loree, Jonathan M
Cohen, Joshua D
Wong, Rachel
Price, Timothy
Tebbutt, Niall C
Gebski, Val
Espinoza, David
Burge, Matthew
Harris, Sam
Lynam, James
Lee, Belinda
Lee, Margaret M
Breadner, Daniel
Debrincat, Marlyse
Foroughi, Siavash
Chantrill, Lorraine
Lim, Stephanie H
Gill, Sharlene
O'Callaghan, Chris
Ptak, Janine
Silliman, Natalie
Dobbyn, Lisa
Popoli, Maria
Bettegowda, Chetan
Papadopoulos, Nicholas
Kinzler, Kenneth W
Vogelstein, Bert
Gibbs, Peter
Notes
Karanth, Narayan collaborator in AGITG DYNAMIC-III Study Group (Intergroup Study of the Australasian Gastro-Intestinal Trials Group and Canadian Cancer Trials Group)
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer provides uncertain benefit at the individual level. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may help refine risk-adjusted treatment selection. In this multicenter, randomized, phase 2/3 trial, patients with stage III colon cancer underwent ctDNA testing 5-6 weeks after surgery and were assigned (1:1) to ctDNA-guided or standard management. In the ctDNA-guided arm, patients negative for ctDNA received de-escalated therapy, whereas ctDNA-positive patients received escalated therapy. Clinicians prespecified the standard regimen. Primary endpoints were 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) for ctDNA-negative patients and 2-year RFS for ctDNA-positive patients. Secondary endpoints included treatment-related hospitalization and ctDNA clearance. Among 968 evaluable patients, 702 (72.5%) were ctDNA negative. With a median follow-up of 47 months, ctDNA-negative patients experienced significantly fewer recurrences than ctDNA-positive patients (3-year RFS 87% versus 49%; P < 0.001). In ctDNA-negative patients, de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin use (34.8% versus 88.6%) and hospitalizations (8.5% versus 13.2%) but yielded slightly lower RFS than standard management (85.3% versus 88.1%), not meeting the non-inferiority margin. In ctDNA-positive patients, higher ctDNA burden correlated with recurrence risk (3-year RFS 77% to 23% across quartiles; P < 0.001). Escalated therapy did not improve outcomes over standard management (2-year RFS 51% versus 61%). There was no unexpected toxicity. Persistent ctDNA after treatment predicted markedly worse prognosis (3-year RFS 14% versus 79%). ctDNA is validated as a strong prognostic classifier. ctDNA-guided de-escalation reduced oxaliplatin exposure and adverse events with outcomes approaching standard of care, whereas exploratory chemotherapy intensification conferred no RFS benefit, suggesting a need for novel strategies in ctDNA-positive disease.Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry Identifier: ACTRN12617001566325 .
Publication information
Nat Med . 2025 Oct 20. doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-04030-w. Online ahead of print.
Date Issued
2025-10-20
Type
Journal Article
Journal Title
Nature medicine
Permanent link to this record
Owning collection
