Further evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for melioidosis in an area of endemicity.

Author(s)
O'Brien, Mathew
Freeman, Kevin
Lum, Gary
Cheng, Allen C
Jacups, Susan P
Currie, Bart
Publication Date
2004-05-01
Abstract
Immunochromatographic test (ICT) kits for the rapid detection of immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM antibodies to Burkholderia pseudomallei were compared to the indirect hemagglutination (IHA) assay. In 138 culture-confirmed melioidosis cases, sensitivities were 80, 77, and 88% for IHA, ICT IgG, and ICT IgM, respectively. In a prospective study of 160 consecutive sera samples sent for melioidosis serology, respective specificities were 91, 90, and 69, positive predictive values were 41, 32, and 18, and negative predictive values were 99, 98, and 100%. ICT IgM kits are unreliable for diagnosis of melioidosis, but ICT IgG kits may be useful for diagnosing travelers presenting with possible melioidosis who return from regions where melioidosis is endemic.
Citation
J Clin Microbiol . 2004 May;42(5):2239-40. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.5.2239-2240.2004.
ISSN
0095-1137
Pubmed ID
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15131200/?otool=iaurydwlib
Link
MESH subject
Antibodies, Bacterial
Burkholderia pseudomallei
Hemagglutination Tests
Humans
Immunoassay
Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulin M
Melioidosis
Northern Territory
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Travel
Title
Further evaluation of a rapid diagnostic test for melioidosis in an area of endemicity.
Type of document
Journal Article
Entity Type
Publication

Files:

NameSizeformatDescriptionLink
https://digitallibrary.health.nt.gov.au/nthealthserver/api/core/items/4bcaeaa6-b4a3-47ca-b9f5-44b12bda662c