Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/8005
Email LibraryRMU.DOH@nt.gov.au to ask for this document in a different format
Title: Is one dose of human papillomavirus vaccine as effective as three?: A national cohort analysis.
Authors: Brotherton, Julia Ml
Budd, Alison
Rompotis, Christopher
Bartlett, Natasha
Malloy, Michael J
Andersen, Rachael L
Coulter, Kim Ar
Couvee, Peter W
Steel, Nerida
Ward, Gail H
Saville, Marion
Citation: Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 2019; 8: 100177
Abstract: Prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are highly effective at preventing pre-cancerous cervical lesions when given in a three-dose schedule. Some post-hoc trial data suggest that one dose prevents HPV infection. If one dose could prevent pre-cancerous cervical lesions, then global cervical cancer prevention would be greatly facilitated. We assessed the effectiveness of quadrivalent HPV vaccine by number of doses against cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2 or 3/adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS)/cancer in Australia up to seven years post vaccination. We linked registry data from all 8 jurisdictional cervical screening registers, with the national HPV vaccination register, death index and cancer registers for all Australian women aged 15 or under when eligible for vaccine who screened between April 2007 (when vaccination commenced) and 31 December 2014. We performed Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusted a priori for age, socioeconomic status, and area of residence, to estimate hazard ratios of histologically confirmed CIN2/CIN3/AIS/cancer. We included 250,648 women: 48,845 (19·5%) unvaccinated, 174,995 (69·8%) had received three doses, 18,190 (7·3%) two doses and 8,618 (3·4%) one dose. The adjusted hazard ratio was significantly lower for all dose groups compared to unvaccinated women (1 dose 0·65 (95%CI 0·52-0·81), 2 doses 0·61 (0·52-0·72) and 3 doses 0·59 (0·54-0·65).) With adjustment for age at vaccination amongst the vaccinated group, the adjusted hazard ratios for one dose and two dose recipients were comparable to three dose recipients (one dose 1.01 (95%CI 0.81-1.26), two doses 1.00 (0.85-1.17).) Multiple sensitivity analyses, including use of different dose assignment methods, produced consistent findings. Comparison with a historical cohort of age matched women showed that the result was not due to herd protection alone. One dose had comparable effectiveness as two or three doses in preventing high-grade disease in a high coverage setting. These findings support the hypothesis that one dose vaccination may be a viable strategy when working towards the global elimination of cervical cancer.
Click to open PubMed article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319173
Click to open Pubmed Article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31319173
Journal title: Papillomavirus research (Amsterdam, Netherlands)
Publication Date: 2019
Type: Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/8005
DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2019.100177
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.