Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Functional evaluation and practice survey to guide purchasing of intravenous cannulae.
Authors: Tay, Stanley
Spain, Brian
Morandell, Kirstie
Gilson, Jesse
Weinberg, Laurence
Story, David
Citation: BMC anesthesiology 2013-12-24; 13(1): 49
Abstract: There are wide variations in the physical designs and attributes between different brands of intravenous cannulae that makes product selection and purchasing difficult. In a systematic assessment to guide purchasing, we assessed two cannulae - Cannula P and I. We proposed that the results of in-vitro performance testing of the cannulae would be associated with preference after clinical comparison. We designed an observer-blinded randomised head-to-head trial between the 18, 20 and 22 gauge versions of Cannula P and I. Our primary end-point was pressure (mmHg) generated during various flow rates and our secondary end-point was the force (Newton) required to slide the catheter away from the needle. This was followed by a prospective electronic survey following a two-week clinical trial period. The mean difference in resistance between Cannula P and I was: 307 (95% CI: 289-325, p < 0.001) for 22G; 135 (95% CI: 125-144, p < 0.001) for 20G; and 27 (95% CI: 26-28, p < 0.001) for 18G. The mean difference in the force needed to displace the catheter away from its needle was: 1.41 N (95% CI: 1.09-1.73, p < 0.001) for 22G; 0.19 N (95% CI: -0.04-0.41, p = 0.12) for 20G; and 1.96 N (95% CI: 1.40-2.52, p < 0.001) for 18G. After a trial period, all 16 anaesthetist who had used both cannulae preferred Cannula I to P. The evaluation process described here could help hospitals improve efficient product selection and purchasing decisions for intravenous cannulae.
Click to open PubMed article:
Click to open Pubmed Article:
Journal title: BMC anesthesiology
Publication Date: 2013-12-24
ISSN: 1471-2253
Type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2253-13-49
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing


PubMed References

Who's citing