Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/5479
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOsowicki Jen
dc.contributor.authorGwee Aen
dc.contributor.authorNoronha Jen
dc.contributor.authorBritton PNen
dc.contributor.authorIsaacs Den
dc.contributor.authorLai TBen
dc.contributor.authorNourse Cen
dc.contributor.authorAvent Men
dc.contributor.authorMoriarty Pen
dc.contributor.authorFrancis JRen
dc.contributor.authorBlyth CCen
dc.contributor.authorCooper CMen
dc.contributor.authorBryant PAen
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-15T23:00:59Zen
dc.date.available2018-05-15T23:00:59Zen
dc.date.issued2015-08en
dc.identifier.citationThe Pediatric infectious disease journal 2015-08; 34(8): e185-90en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10137/5479en
dc.description.abstractThere is increasing recognition of the threat to neonatal patients from antibiotic resistance. There are limited data on antimicrobial prescribing practices for hospitalized neonates. We aimed to describe antimicrobial use in hospitalized Australian neonatal patients, and to determine its appropriateness. Multicentre single-day hospital-wide point prevalence survey in 2012, in conjunction with the Antimicrobial Resistance and Prescribing in European Children study. The appropriateness of antimicrobial prescriptions was also assessed. All patients admitted at 8 am on the survey day, in 6 neonatal units in tertiary children's hospitals across 5 states, were included in an analysis of the quantity and quality of all antimicrobial prescriptions. The point prevalence survey included 6 neonatal units and 236 patients. Of 109 patients (46%) receiving at least 1 antimicrobial, 66 (61%) were being treated for infection, with sepsis the most common indication. There were 216 antimicrobial prescriptions, 134 (62%) for treatment of infection and 82 (38%) for prophylaxis, mostly oral nystatin. Only 15 prescriptions were for targeted as opposed to empirical treatment. Penicillin and gentamicin were the most commonly prescribed antibiotics, with vancomycin third most common. Half of all treated patients were receiving combination antimicrobial therapy. There was marked variation in vancomycin and gentamicin dosing. Overall, few prescriptions (4%) were deemed inappropriate. This is the first Australia-wide point prevalence survey of neonatal antimicrobial prescribing in tertiary children's hospitals. The findings highlight positive practices and potential targets for quality improvement.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.titleAustralia-wide Point Prevalence Survey of Antimicrobial Prescribing in Neonatal Units: How Much and How Good?en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.identifier.journaltitleThe Pediatric infectious disease journalen
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/INF.0000000000000719en
dc.identifier.pubmedidhttps://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed//25961896en
dc.subject.meshAntibiotic Prophylaxisen
dc.subject.meshCross-Sectional Studiesen
dc.subject.meshFemaleen
dc.subject.meshHumansen
dc.subject.meshInfant, Newbornen
dc.subject.meshIntensive Care Units, Neonatalen
dc.subject.meshMaleen
dc.subject.meshPrescriptionsen
dc.subject.meshSepsisen
dc.subject.meshAnti-Infective Agentsen
dc.subject.meshDrug Resistance, Bacterialen
dc.identifier.affiliationFrom the *Infectious Diseases Unit, Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; †Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; ‡Department of Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Monash Children's Hospital, Clayton, Victoria, Australia; §Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; ¶Pharmacy Department, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia; ‖Infection Management and Prevention Service, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; **Department of Paediatrics, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; ††Mater Pharmacy Services, Mater Health, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; ‡‡University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; §§Department of General Paediatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; ¶¶Department of Paediatrics, Royal Darwin Hospital, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia; ‖‖School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; ***PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Princess Margaret Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; †††Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia; ‡‡‡SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; and §§§Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia..en
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing