Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/5392
Email LibraryRMU.DOH@nt.gov.au to ask for this document in a different format
Title: Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial.
Authors: Ralph, Anna P
Read, Clancy
Johnston, Vanessa
de Dassel, Jessica L
Bycroft, Kerstin
Mitchell, Alice
Bailie, Ross S
Maguire, Graeme P
Edwards, Keith
Currie, Bart J
Kirby, Adrienne
Carapetis, Jonathan R
Citation: Trials 2016-01-27; 17: 51
Abstract: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), caused by acute rheumatic fever (ARF), is a major health problem in Australian Aboriginal communities. Progress in controlling RHD requires improvements in the delivery of secondary prophylaxis, which comprises regular, long-term injections of penicillin for people with ARF/RHD. This trial aims to improve uptake of secondary prophylaxis among Aboriginal people with ARF/RHD to reduce progression or worsening of RHD. This is a stepped-wedge, randomised trial in consenting communities in Australia's Northern Territory. Pairs of randomly-chosen clinics from among those consenting enter the study at 3-monthly steps. The intervention to which clinics are randomised comprises a multi-faceted systems-based package, in which clinics are supported to develop and implement strategies to improve penicillin delivery, aligned with elements of the Chronic Care Model. Continuous quality improvement processes will be used, including 3-monthly feedback to clinic staff of adherence rates of their ARF/RHD clients. The primary outcome is the proportion of people with ARF/RHD receiving ≥ 80% of scheduled penicillin injections over a minimum 12-month period. The sample size of 300 ARF/RHD clients across five community clusters will power the study to detect a 20% increase in the proportion of individuals achieving this target, from a worrying low baseline of 20%, to 40 %. Secondary outcomes pertaining to other measures of adherence will be assessed. Within the randomised trial design, a mixed-methods evaluation will be embedded to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, impact and relevance, sustainability, process and fidelity, and performance of the intervention. The evaluation will establish any causal link between outcomes and the intervention. The planned study duration is from 2013 to 2016. Continuous quality improvement has a strong track record in Australia's Northern Territory, and its use has resulted in modest benefits in a pilot, non-randomised ARF/RHD study. If successful, this new intervention using the Chronic Care Model as a scaffold and evaluated using a well-developed theory-based framework, will provide a practical and transferable approach to ARF/RHD control. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000223730. Date registered: 25 February 2013.
Click to open PubMed article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818484
Click to open Pubmed Article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818484
Journal title: Trials
Publication Date: 2016-01-27
Type: Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/5392
DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.