Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/12533
Title: Practice of dialysis access interventional nephrology procedures in the Asia-Pacific region: Getting lay of the land.
Authors: Jasuja S
Gallieni M
Jha V
Vachharajani T
Bhalla A K
Tan J
Tan C S
Basnet N B
Herath N
Hai An H P
Kim Y S
Kim Y
SampathKumar K
Sahay M
Ramachandran R
Alexander S
Bhargava V
Balasubramaniam J
Voss D
Ogbac F E
Gunawan A
Goh B L
Lin C-C
Khan J
Shiham I
Ayub H
Hein M A
Iqbal S
Srisawat N
Gao B
Sajiv C
Wilkinson C
Pichthida T
Rana D S
Sagar G
Bahl A
Tawakley S
Gaur M
Citation: ¬© 2023 Asian Pacific Society of Nephrology.
Nephrology (Carlton). 2023 Sep 11. doi: 10.1111/nep.14236.
Abstract: AIM: This cross-sectional survey aimed to determine the prevalence of Interventional Nephrology (IN) practice amongst nephrologists in the Asia-Pacific Region (APR), specifically related to dialysis access (DA). METHODS: The Association of VA and intervenTionAl Renal physicians (AVATAR) Foundation from India conducted a multinational online survey amongst nephrologists from the Asia-Pacific to determine the practice of IN in the planning, creation, and management of dialysis access. The treatment modalities, manpower and equipment availability, monthly cost of treatment, specifics of dialysis access interventions, and challenges in the training and practice of IN by nephrologists were included in the survey. RESULTS: Twenty-one countries from the APR participated in the survey. Nephrologists from 18 (85.7%) countries reported performing at least one of the basic dialysis access-related IN procedures, primarily the placement of non-tunnelled central catheters (n-TCC; 71.5%). Only 10 countries (47.6%) reported having an average of <4% of nephrologists performing any of the advanced IN access procedures, the most common being the placement of a peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter (20%). Lack of formal training (57.14%), time (42.8%), incentive (38%), institutional support (38%), medico-legal protection (28.6%), and prohibitive cost (23.8%) were the main challenges to practice IN. The primary obstacles to implementing the IN training were a lack of funding and skilled personnel. CONCLUSION: The practice of dialysis access-related IN in APR is inadequate, mostly due to a lack of training, backup support, and economic constraints, whereas training in access-related IN is constrained by a lack of a skilled workforce and finances.
Click to open Pubmed Article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37697492
Journal title: Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)
Publication Date: 2023-09-11
Type: Journal Article
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/12533
DOI: 10.1111/nep.14236
Orcid: 0000-0003-1707-5650
0000-0002-4494-966X
0000-0002-8176-9393
0000-0003-1059-1484
0000-0001-5534-2516
0000-0001-7692-606X
0000-0002-4644-7743
0000-0002-8544-8132
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing

Pubmed

PubMed References

Who's citing