Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Abbreviated Echocardiographic Screening for Rheumatic Heart Disease by Nonexperts with and without Offsite Expert Review: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.
Authors: Francis J
Fairhurst H
Yan J
Fernandes Monteiro A
Lee A
Maurays J
Kaethner A
Whalley G
Hardefeldt H
Williamson J
Marangou J
Reeves B
Wheaton G
Robertson T
Horton A
Cush J
Wade V
Monteiro A
Draper A
Morris P
Ralph A
Remenyi B
Citation: Copyright © 2023 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2023 Jul;36(7):733-745. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.02.007. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Early detection of rheumatic heart disease (RHD) through echocardiographic screening can facilitate early access to effective treatment, which reduces the risk for progression. Accurate, feasible approaches to echocardiographic screening that can be incorporated into routine health services are needed. The authors hypothesized that offsite expert review could improve the diagnostic accuracy of nonexpert-obtained echocardiographic images. METHODS: This prospective cross-sectional study was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of health worker-conducted single parasternal long-axis view with a sweep of the heart using hand-carried ultrasound for the detection of RHD in high-risk populations in Timor-Leste and Australia. In the primary analysis, the presence of any mitral or aortic regurgitation met the criteria for a positive screening result. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for a screen-and-refer approach based on nonexpert practitioner assessment (approach 1) and for an approach using offsite expert review of nonexpert practitioner-obtained images to decide onward referral (approach 2). Each participant had a reference test performed by an expert echocardiographer on the same day as the index test. Diagnosis of RHD was determined by a panel of three experts, using 2012 World Heart Federation criteria. RESULTS: The prevalence of borderline or definite RHD among 3,329 participants was 4.0% (95% CI, 3.4%-4.7%). The sensitivity of approach 1 for borderline or definite RHD was 86.5% (95% CI, 79.5%-91.8%), and the specificity was 61.4% (95% CI, 59.7%-63.1%). Approach 2 achieved similar sensitivity (88.4%; 95% CI, 81.5%-93.3%) and improved specificity (77.1%; 95% CI, 75.6%-78.6%). CONCLUSION: Nonexpert practitioner-obtained single parasternal long-axis view with a sweep of the heart images, reviewed by an offsite expert, can detect borderline and definite RHD on screening with reasonable sensitivity and specificity. Brief training of nonexpert practitioners with ongoing support could be used as an effective strategy for scaling up echocardiographic screening for RHD in high-risk settings.
Click to open Pubmed Article:
Journal title: Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography
Volume: 36
Pages: 733-745
Publication Date: 2023-07
Type: Journal Article
DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2023.02.007
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.

Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing


PubMed References

Who's citing