Bucalon B

Whitelock-Wainwright E

Williams C

Conley J

Veysey, Martin

Kay J

Shaw T

2023-02-16

BACKGROUND: Hospitals routinely collect large amounts of administrative data such as length of stay, 28-day readmissions, and hospital-acquired complications; yet, these data are underused for continuing professional development (CPD). First, these clinical indicators are rarely reviewed outside of existing quality and safety reporting. Second, many medical specialists view their CPD requirements as time-consuming, having minimal impact on practice change and improving patient outcomes. There is an opportunity to build new user interfaces based on these data, designed to support individual and group reflection. Data-informed reflective practice has the potential to generate new insights about performance, bridging the gap between CPD and clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to understand why routinely collected administrative data have not yet become widely used to support reflective practice and lifelong learning. METHODS: We conducted semistructured interviews (N=19) with thought leaders from a range of backgrounds, including clinicians, surgeons, chief medical officers, information and communications technology professionals, informaticians, researchers, and leaders from related industries. Interviews were thematically analyzed by 2 independent coders. RESULTS: Respondents identified visibility of outcomes, peer comparison, group reflective discussions, and practice change as potential benefits. The key barriers included legacy technology, distrust with data quality, privacy, data misinterpretation, and team culture. Respondents suggested recruiting local champions for co-design, presenting data for understanding rather than information, coaching by specialty group leaders, and timely reflection linked to CPD as enablers to successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, there was consensus among thought leaders, bringing together insights from diverse backgrounds and medical jurisdictions. We found that clinicians are interested in repurposing administrative data for professional development despite concerns with underlying data quality, privacy, legacy technology, and visual presentation. They prefer group reflection led by supportive specialty group leaders, rather than individual reflection. Our findings provide novel insights into the specific benefits, barriers, and benefits of potential reflective practice interfaces based on these data sets. They can inform the design of new models of in-hospital reflection linked to the annual CPD planning-recording-reflection cycle.

Human Centred Technology Research Cluster, School of Computer Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Centre for Learning Analytics, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Adventist HealthCare Limited, Wahroonga, Australia.

Division of Medicine, Royal Darwin Hospital, Tiwi, Australia.

Research in Implementation Science and e-Health Group, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 16;25:e40685. doi: 10.2196/40685.

0000-0001-5528-781X

0000-0003-1073-895X

0000-0003-3678-1796

0000-0003-0108-3285

0000-0002-8652-0036

0000-0001-6728-2768

0000-0003-0783-1918

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36795463/?otool=iaurydwlib

https://hdl.handle.net/10137/12400

25

Thought Leader Perspectives on the Benefits, Barriers, and Enablers for Routinely Collected Electronic Health Data to Support Professional Development: Qualitative Study.

Journal Article

Publication