Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/12242
Title: Optimising medical retrieval processes and outcomes in remote areas in high-income countries: A scoping review.
Authors: Mathew, Supriya
Russell, Deborah J
Fitts, Michelle S
Wakerman, John
Honan, Bridget
Johnson, Richard
Zhao, Yuejen
Reeve, David
Niclasen, Petra
Citation: © 2022 National Rural Health Alliance Ltd.
Aust J Rural Health. 2022 Jul 19. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12908.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This scoping review explores the structure and process-level strategies that are associated with medical retrieval outcomes. A secondary aim is to identify the range of medical retrieval outcomes used to assess the performance of remote retrieval services. DESIGN: A scoping review of peer-reviewed literature from PubMed, CINAHL and the Web of Science was undertaken following guidelines set by the Johanna Briggs Institute manual for scoping reviews. All articles were assessed by two reviewers. Themes were derived inductively from the data extracted. SETTING: Medical retrievals in sparsely populated remote locations in high-income countries. PARTICIPANTS: Staff and clients of remote medical retrieval services. INTERVENTIONS: Structures and processes (e.g. resource availability, retrieval staff structures and governance protocols) that aimed to improve medical retrieval outcomes. OUTCOMES: Patient health outcomes and service efficiency. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles were included. Three broad themes, related to the nature of the interventions, were included: optimising prehospital management of retrievals, staffing and resourcing of retrieval services and retrieval model evaluation. Mortality was the most frequently used outcome indicator in these studies, but was not measured consistently across studies. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights significant gaps in the literature that describes the structure and processes of retrieval models operating in remote areas and a dearth of literature evaluating specific operational strategies implemented within medical retrieval models. The available literature does not meaningfully assist with identifying key outcome indicators for developing a consistent monitoring and evaluation framework for retrieval services in geographically, culturally and demographically diverse remote contexts.
Click to open Pubmed Article: https://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35852929
Journal title: The Australian journal of rural health
Publication Date: 2022-07-19
Type: Journal Article
Review
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/12242
DOI: 10.1111/ajr.12908
Orcid: 0000-0002-8078-3708
0000-0003-2221-7334
0000-0003-2839-5430
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing

Pubmed

PubMed References

Who's citing