Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/10137/11846
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGoodman, Clareen
dc.contributor.authorKeating, Georgiaen
dc.contributor.authorGeorgousopoulou, Ekavien
dc.contributor.authorHespe, Charlotteen
dc.contributor.authorLevett, Kateen
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-20T04:32:05Zen
dc.date.available2021-08-20T04:32:05Zen
dc.date.issued2021-08-12en
dc.identifier.citation© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.en
dc.identifier.citationBMJ Open. 2021 Aug 12;11(8):e043054. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043054.en
dc.identifier.other101552874en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10137/11846en
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: To evaluate existing evidence for the use of probiotics in preventing antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD) in adults. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: We performed a literature search of the electronic databases CINAHL Plus, EMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid) and Web of Science from database inception to May 2021 as well as hand searching of trial registries and reference lists of related reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers identified whether RCTs met the following inclusion criteria: adult population to whom antibiotics were administered; a probiotic intervention; a placebo, alternative dose, alternative probiotic strain or no treatment control; and incidence of AAD as the outcome. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently collected data and assessed risk of bias using preconstructed data extraction forms. We used a random effects model for all analyses. Subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate species-specific and dose-specific response. RESULTS: Forty-two studies (11,305 participants) were included in this review. The pooled analysis suggests that co-administration of probiotics with antibiotics reduces the risk of AAD in adults by 37% (risk ratio (RR)=0.63 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.73), p<0.00001). The overall quality of the evidence using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria was found to be moderate. In subgroup analyses, high dose compared with low dose of the same probiotic demonstrated a positive protective effect (RR 0.54 (95% CI 0.38 to 0.76), p<0.01), and only certain species, mainly of the lactobacillus and bifidobacteria genera, were found to be effective. Studies with a low baseline AAD risk did not show any difference in risk but studies with moderate or high baseline AAD risk demonstrated a significant risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: Probiotics are effective for preventing AAD. Secondary analyses of higher dosages and certain species have shown increased effectiveness. Our results may not be applicable in clinical scenarios of lower baseline AAD risk.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.subjectAdulten
dc.subjectAnti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effectsen
dc.subjectDiarrhea/chemically induced/drug therapy/prevention & controlen
dc.subjectHumansen
dc.subjectIncidenceen
dc.subjectLactobacillusen
dc.subject*Probiotics/therapeutic useen
dc.titleProbiotics for the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis.en
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeMeta-Analysisen
dc.typeSystematic Reviewen
dc.publisher.placeEnglanden
dc.identifier.journaltitleBMJ openen
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043054en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-5393-5665en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0002-4582-7728en
dc.identifier.orcid0000-0003-3784-4648en
dc.identifier.pubmedurihttps://www.ezpdhcs.nt.gov.au/login?url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34385227en
dc.format.pagese043054en
dc.description.affiliationNational School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia kate.levett@nd.edu.au.en
dc.description.affiliationDepartment of Pharmacy, Alice Springs Hospital, Alice Springs, Northern Territory, Australia.en
dc.description.affiliationNational School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.en
dc.source.volume11en
local.issue.number2044-6055 (Electronic)-
local.issue.number2044-6055 (Linking)-
Appears in Collections:(a) NT Health Research Collection

Files in This Item:
There are no files associated with this item.


Items in ePublications are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Google Media

Google ScholarTM

Who's citing

Pubmed

PubMed References

Who's citing