Title
Task-shifting to nonexperts using artificial intelligence-guided point-of-care ultrasound: a cohort study of patient selection, image quality, and learning curves
Link to article in PubMed
Author(s)
Wright, Leah
Soh, Cheng Hwee
Seidel, Bastian
Mylius, Tony
Yu, Christopher
Wahi, Sudhir
Marwick, Thomas H
Abstract
AIMS: To define rates of diagnostic image acquisition, clinical drivers of image quality and the learning curve for artificial intelligence (AI)-guided image acquisition on point-of-care ultrasound (AI-POCUS) in rural and remote communities.
METHODS AND RESULTS: AI-guided image acquisition on point-of-care ultrasound was performed using AI software integrated with a desktop ultrasound system in 181 participants (65 ± 15 years, 47% female). A standardized training protocol included online material, lab attendance for 1 day, and online mentoring. Diagnostic-quality images were obtained from 72% of parasternal and 55% of apical images ( < 0.001). Scans were classified as 'Diagnostic' if diagnostic-quality images were obtained in the majority of parasternal and apical views (ACEP score ≥3) in ≥50% of windows for both apical and parasternal views. Body surface area (BSA) [OR 0.16 (0.05;0.50), = 0.002] and hypertension [OR 0.50 (0.27;0.93), = 0.03] were associated with diagnostic image quality in the apical window, whereas only hypertension [OR 0.43 (0.20;0.88), = 0.024] was associated with diagnostic quality in the parasternal window. The learning curve was assessed by comparing the quality according to quantity of scans performed and professional background (nurse, health worker, or general physician). Physician-acquired scans [OR 3.85 (1.92;8.33), < 0.001], scan 11th onwards [OR 2.86 (1.45;5.56), = 0.002], and users who performed ≥20 scans [OR 3.58 (1.79;7.14), < 0.001] predicted study completeness.
CONCLUSION: In rural community practice, the learning curve associated with AI-POCUS diagnostic quality seems longer than reported in other studies from inpatient settings. In novice users, diagnostic quality is greater in the parasternal than the apical windows.
METHODS AND RESULTS: AI-guided image acquisition on point-of-care ultrasound was performed using AI software integrated with a desktop ultrasound system in 181 participants (65 ± 15 years, 47% female). A standardized training protocol included online material, lab attendance for 1 day, and online mentoring. Diagnostic-quality images were obtained from 72% of parasternal and 55% of apical images ( < 0.001). Scans were classified as 'Diagnostic' if diagnostic-quality images were obtained in the majority of parasternal and apical views (ACEP score ≥3) in ≥50% of windows for both apical and parasternal views. Body surface area (BSA) [OR 0.16 (0.05;0.50), = 0.002] and hypertension [OR 0.50 (0.27;0.93), = 0.03] were associated with diagnostic image quality in the apical window, whereas only hypertension [OR 0.43 (0.20;0.88), = 0.024] was associated with diagnostic quality in the parasternal window. The learning curve was assessed by comparing the quality according to quantity of scans performed and professional background (nurse, health worker, or general physician). Physician-acquired scans [OR 3.85 (1.92;8.33), < 0.001], scan 11th onwards [OR 2.86 (1.45;5.56), = 0.002], and users who performed ≥20 scans [OR 3.58 (1.79;7.14), < 0.001] predicted study completeness.
CONCLUSION: In rural community practice, the learning curve associated with AI-POCUS diagnostic quality seems longer than reported in other studies from inpatient settings. In novice users, diagnostic quality is greater in the parasternal than the apical windows.
Publication information
Eur Heart J Imaging Methods Pract . 2026 Jul 6;4(3):qyag101. doi: 10.1093/ehjimp/qyag101. eCollection 2026 Aug.
File(s)![Thumbnail Image]()
Loading...
Name
Task-shifting to nonexperts using artificial intelligence-guided point-of-care ultrasound.pdf
Description
Re-used under a Creative Commons Attribution License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Size
741.65 KB
Format
Adobe PDF
Checksum
(MD5):db6c0a39c71f205e6621a2d8f7a2a66d
Date Issued
2026-07-06
Type
Journal Article
Journal Title
European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice
Permanent link to this record
Journal Issues
Owning collection
